You Know That Scene In Jotunheim In Thor 1 When Volstagg's Arm Gets Frostbite Bc A Jotun Touched Him?

You know that scene in Jotunheim in Thor 1 when Volstagg's arm gets frostbite bc a Jotun touched him? I personally think it only happens when they feel threatened. Like, considering what little we actually know about Jotunheim (other than Asgardian propaganda) I think it's plausible.

This might be an unpopular opinion, but of all the characters in the MCU, Nebula deserved to kill Thanos the most. Gamora and Loki also deserved justice. Remember, Thanos tortured all three of them. He surgically “enhanced” Gamora so she could be a weapon, put Loki under the influence of the mind stone and tortured him to the point he was struggling to walk in Avengers(while also having the Other physically harm him when communicating, not to mention the on screen coercion), and ripped Nebula apart and put her back together enough for her to be mainly metal by Infinity War. The three of them were personally affected by Thanos yet two of them die by his hand, and the other doesn’t even get to avenge herself? Not to mention the fact that the Russos not only tried to make Thanos’ sacrifice seem sympathetic, but also as if he wasn’t the cruel genocidal bastard we saw in the end credits of Age of Ultron, who in Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 1 called Ronin boy and promised to destroy an entire planet without blinking an eye if he gave him the power stone. It’s interesting that the MCU attempts to justify an abuser while conveniently refusing to acknowledge the people they’ve abused.

Listen buddy…

I don’t want your first born.

I don’t want your gold.

I don’t want your crops.

I don’t want your crown, or your kingdom.

This dragon just wants your hat.

And if you don’t give me your hat, I will burn all of your crops and steal it anyway.

I KNOW HOW MY FILTHY MUTANT ABILITIES UPSET YOU, SCHMIDT. DON’T WORRY–

–YOU WILL DIE PURE. NO MAGNETISM 

JUST FISTS.

just wanting to prove a quick point here. reblog if you believe loki is a complex, well-developed, three-dimensional character who didn’t deserve to be killed in the first 5 minutes of the movie. let’s see how many we are

Just a quick reminder:

Queer characters don’t always have to be played by queer actors. It’s nice for the representation, but there’s no way to judge how “queer” people “should” be in order for them to play the character. Like, again, they’re actors. It’s their job to act as other people. Of course, not to say that’s an excuse, but sometimes certain actors just make the cut. Do you guys even know about Kit Connor? He only came out as bi because people were pressuring him for playing a queer character as a presumably straight actor. That’s not ok. Claiming queer characters need to be played by queer actors only enforces the stereotype that they must be “visibly” queer enough to play that character. Not every queer person is visibly queer. For example: I’m genderfluid. But I don’t try and “match” or dress differently to what gender I’m feeling. I have no desire to get a binder, or pack, or dress whatever may stereotypically show that my gender is different. And not every trans person feels gender dysphoria. It’s pushes an unfair stereotype that if you’re trans, and you don’t feel gender dysphoria, you’re not actually trans. Just because I don’t feel gender dysphoria, doesn’t mean I’m not genderfluid. I know for a fact I’m genderfluid, because it literally makes me so fucking happy to identify that way( gender euphoria), and I know others who feel the same. But you’re not gonna see me having all of these feelings, because you would literally have to look in my brain.

TLDR; stop gate keeping queer characters and trying to enforce the stereotype that you must act and look a certain way to be queer. It doesn’t help anyone, and just isolates trans people who don’t experience gender dysphoria.