
noel | 19 | he/him | ☀️/🌙 aquarius / ⬆️ leo | multifandom (random atp)
663 posts
!! This Wasnt Directed Towards You At All! Lemme Elaborate Further:
!! This wasn’t directed towards you at all! Lemme elaborate further:
I specifically wanted to hit that nail on the head, that people didn’t care about Sam playing a female PC in campaign two, but the MOMENT he played a nonbinary or gnc character, they were up in arms. It was meant to be a question directed at those people. I wanted to showcase that this wasn’t a matter of the players playing a PC with a gender different to their character, it was just a blatantly transphobic complaint transphobic critters were making. How were they gonna be fine with a guy playing a female character, but not a guy playing a nonbinary/masc character? That’s transpshobic nitpicking.
I agreed with your post completely, but I just felt like that distinction could be added to your argument. I’m not good at phrasing things sometimes, so thank you for asking me to clarify!
Edit: It was meant to be some sort of straight to the point question to those transphobic critters if they ever came across your post/my reblog of it, I can see why you could see it as me directing it at you. But not at all! I think you made great points.
I know some people wanted all new characters but I can’t help but feel like the people complaining about the ExU characters (in earnest, not just saying, aw, not what I wanted, but those genuinely angry they “are being forced” to watch ExU now or whatever) are shockingly entitled. Matt had said that the players who are continuing with those PCs decided they would prefer to after playing ExU. Even with as extensive and impressive as The Critical Role Extended Universe™️ is now, it is literally still their game that they have invited us into, and as long as Crit Role continues to be completely free (or “pay what you want,” if you want to be really pedantic), I think it’s ridiculous for people to ever expect them to sacrifice their enjoyment for basically any reason. Not to mention it would literally ruin the show, but seeing into their game is still a privilege and not a right.
And I won’t even touch the complaints about Sam and Taliesin playing characters with “he/they” pronouns. People can play characters with whichever pronouns they want regardless of their own gender identity and pronouns, I am begging you to go outside.
-
lostinsidemyminds liked this · 10 months ago
-
homovaurio liked this · 2 years ago
-
vartoids liked this · 3 years ago
-
writing-james liked this · 3 years ago
-
geeky-karo liked this · 3 years ago
-
mega11ee liked this · 3 years ago
-
no-pretence-of-something liked this · 3 years ago
-
veniovediovici liked this · 3 years ago
-
pandora-moth-boi liked this · 3 years ago
-
sessenaa liked this · 3 years ago
-
spongeeater liked this · 3 years ago
-
a-exists liked this · 3 years ago
-
exhaustedwerewolf reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
carter-is-a-disaster liked this · 3 years ago
-
elusivemellifluence reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
fifteenth-entity reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
slushrottweiler liked this · 3 years ago
-
certified-diplodocus liked this · 3 years ago
-
nein-pirate-lords liked this · 3 years ago
-
notaficwriter liked this · 3 years ago
-
tricksters-lollipop liked this · 3 years ago
-
laurenthemself reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
exhaustedwerewolf reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
fifteenth-entity reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
fifteenth-entity liked this · 3 years ago
-
wizards-and-t liked this · 3 years ago
-
funck liked this · 3 years ago
-
fandoms1reality0 liked this · 3 years ago
-
autisticassassinbird liked this · 3 years ago
-
caelumsthelimit liked this · 3 years ago
-
painted--elf reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
beartrust42 liked this · 3 years ago
-
a-murder-a-queer-crows liked this · 3 years ago
-
toriftw liked this · 3 years ago
-
wilderebellion liked this · 3 years ago
-
cosmicnuetral liked this · 3 years ago
-
user-67356936740148 liked this · 3 years ago
-
toomanyorigamidragons liked this · 3 years ago
-
fragolinaa liked this · 3 years ago
-
flyinghighoncatnip liked this · 3 years ago
-
probably-not-sherlock liked this · 3 years ago
-
eternal-maniac liked this · 3 years ago
-
mylittlespaceforchaos liked this · 3 years ago
More Posts from Fifteenth-entity
Emoji spell to free yourself from fear
🔮📿🧘🏼♂️🧘🏿♀️🧘🏻🌗🍃🐬🛌🧿
Like to charge, reblog to cast
Take a deep breath. Listen to meditation music
for some of y’all im in the future
it’s looking good, guys, gals, nonbinary pals, and everyone in between or nowhere at all

Even if he wasn’t asleep, Wilbur still enjoyed the warmth. It was better than that place.
merry early christmas!! this was my gift for @mishapen-dear for mcytblr secret santa 2021! (organized by the wonderful @mcytblrsecretsanta , <33) I hope you enjoy your gift <3
people keep saying that techno forcing dream to take his armor off and kicking him out of the anarchist commune is hypocritical and its sent me off the rails multiple times.
techno and dream were NEVER FRIENDS. dream never did something to instigate an act of repayment of kindness by techno, everything he ever did for techno he held over his head and demanded a favor off of him with. saving carl and him from the execution? yeah, thats what PROMPTED the entire favor plotline from the beginning. it wasnt an act of kindness because dream wanted a favor out of it too. it was manipulative and coercive, and techno KNEW this.
during doomsday, he only allied with dream because they shared a common goal and dream was someone techno trusted enough IN THE MOMENT 1. because of the favor 2. because it was a common goal 3. because techno and dream had a similar disdain for the same thing by proxy (techno for lmanburg and dream for tommy), they didnt do it because they were very good pals who hate government, they were just temporary allies to achieve a common goal prompted by personal reasons.
in the will, he didnt even really state he cared for dream, he just went to see if hes alright, cuz that could be detrimental to breaking him out. besides, when he was trapped in the prison with dream, he didnt do anything other than calm dream down enough to the point where he could extract info out of him. never at that point were they friends, and techno never pretended it was this way, and neither did dream.
technos plans for breaking dream out were INDEFINITE, it was only instigated when he saw RANBOO being arrested that got him to enact the plans stat. plus, dream wouldve been a valuable ally inside the prison, being one of the strongest men of the smp. its another thing that he didnt know the mutual hatred between ranboo and dream, but the fact that he was more concerned for ranboo shows as well that techno WASNT friends with dream, he was just doing his part of the favor.
techno never PROMISED he was gonna give dream armor and shelter. why would he need to? dream is one of the strongest people in the smp and techno knows this and dream knows techno knows this. why would the strongest man in the smp only have one set of netherite armor that he lost when he was arrested? that wouldnt make him the strongest man. by assuming dream needed the netherite, techno would effectively be babying dream and spoon-feeding someone he didnt want to spoon-feed. dream is strong. he just lacked the gear and escape plan in the moment because he was caught off guard when he was arrested. i guarantee that if dream was better prepared for a happenstance he couldnt have predicted, then the favor would still be over technos head right now. technos plan involved dream having adequate gear to fend off potential danger, it wasnt a wellness gift from techno to dream, it was a requirement for the escape to go as planned. it was necessary, but it wasnt a gift. as far as we and techno is concerned, any sort of gentle approach imploded when dream showed zero care for ranboo. (not saying dream is wrong for this, they both had their reasons in their moment. just saying that it went against what techno wanted for his friend.) ranboo was more of a priority in technos head cuz they were FRIENDS, dream was just a valuable ally and someone who he owed a favor to, a favor he would repay by also breaking him out.
they were never friends between all this, and i highly doubt theyre friends now. theyre just reluctant allies kept together by a shoddy “favor” that they constantly need to repay each other.
its completely in-character for techno to keep this up as well. people take technos words completely literally in the speech. when he said his little monologue about “repaying kindnesss tenfold and repaying injustice a thousand times over”, it is literally a “an eye for an eye” thing. sure, you can take it literally, but taking it SO literally is a mischaracterization. techno repaid a favor, so dream has to do the same now too. dream was never kind, so techno doesnt have to repay the kindness tenfold. he never treated him with injustice, so he doesnt have to repay that injustice a thousand times over. he owed him a favor, so dream has to repay that favor. fairs fair. thats how techno IS. taking it literally works, but thats just now how techno (cc or c) is if you take a closer look. technos character and monologues are rife with literary references and metaphors. out of all his speeches, why would THIS one be literal?
more people have analyzed dreams character better than i have and ever will in this situation, but why would dream wanna befriend techno NOW? sure, its unfortunate he had to lose such convenient tools at such an inconvenient time, but they were never a neccessity for him. it was just inconvenient, not world-shattering. dream understands this. we know he understands it and holds no animosity to techno for it because of how he was in the dream v sapnap exchange that techno was spying on. if they were friends, wouldnt this be some sort of travesty, a grand betrayal?
as phil said, it was just a business relationship. it was never a friendship, and painting it in such a light is a gross mischaracterization of both techno AND dreams characters.
im all for that good rivalsduo content, but not like this, man. it also baffles me that its mostly the techno apologists that decide to blame techno for THIS. like, cmon, an apologist is supposed to know the cc they apologize for through and through. this negates every argument of theirs, and just shows they dont really know the cc. excuse doomsday and all the other war crimes, sure, but hold techno accountable because “rivalsduo are friends”? mann.