Nothing Brings Me Joy More Than Simping Ridiculously Obnoxiously Over "evil/bad/wrong/complex/villain"

Nothing brings me joy more than simping ridiculously obnoxiously over "evil/bad/wrong/complex/villain" characters just because people can't understand the concept of enjoyment not being the same as condoning.

"How can you like Homelander?! He's a fascist racist murderer!"

Who?? My pookie? My Homie? Homelander?? He's my cinnamon son. Never done a thing wrong in his life.

"Billy Hargrove is an abusive racist who deserved to die!"

Billy Hargrove for President 2024. My BarbieBabygirl has never sinned since the day he was born. He crimed? Instant innocence. He's too pretty for jail.

The moment you try to shame or attack or harass me because I enjoy fictional evil little rat bastards I swear to god I will make promoting them my life mission.

Except Joffrey Lannister. Even in this den of sin we don't go that far. #justiceforthedirewolvesofhousestark

I don't give a shit about pro or anti fic. I personally find a lot of the profic stuff disgusting and reprehensible but i cant be fucked to tell others what to do and this is what people eviscerate me for. thanks for creating a space on this platform that reminds people that this shit does not matter

The whole world is burning and nobody benefits if you set yourself on fire in solidarity.

Was your Safe Spaces post discord-(or any closed forum I guess) specific, or do you think the same should go for fandom-themed blogs on tumblr? Like, if I follow someone for Doctor Who content, I'd rather they didn't put real world issues on my dash, but otoh, it's their blog and they get to decide what they post on it (preferably tagged so I can curate). I've observed that people that run themed blogs that become popular often seem to feel an obligation to use their platform for activism (or, in the case of crypto-radfems, deliberately built their platform to recruit), and it stresses tf out of me for the reasons you mentioned, but it's not like the maintags are much safer because there will be spam relating to real-world issues, or antis trying to relate fiction to real world issues.

Realistically; the same outlook can and could be applied to any social setting. Be it online, private, public, face to face, ect.

Your point about obligation in terms of platform scale is something I've also noticed and have been dabbling about raising. Mostly because you see it a lot with celebrities or public content creators who receive a large following. Its often less that they feel obligated and more than they're usually bullied into it.

For example; I follow a trans (FTM) vlogger on Instagram. His entire online presence is based around being trans and helping to educate people and support people in regards to learning about being transgender, transgender health, his personal transitional journey, ect.

He's got a modest following, nothing ridiculous but I think right now he's sitting at around 75,000 followers.

And as of late, there are random people who don't follow him and aren't at all interested in what he has to say flooding his comment section with things like:

Why didn't you mention anything about Gaza?

All these followers and no shout outs for smaller creators?

What are you doing to raise awareness for X?

All these views could've been used to raise awareness for X.

And its fucking ridiculous. People are pressuring a middle class trans man with 75,000 followers to accept responsibility for counter-responding to a literal war when there are actual celebrities and billionaires with both the actual reach and money to make a difference who simply refuse to because they won't personally benefit from it.

I used to run a really popular fandom blog here on Tumblr. For an actual fandom, not just what I do here and now. It started off small, but I eventually grew it to the point where my follow count was creeping toward 10,000. Which for Tumblr and for a fandom-specific blog was not at all insignificant.

And the moment my notes count started going up, the demands started flooding in. People expecting me to reblog their donation links, demanding I share their friend's aid post, asking why I wasn't reblogging awareness posts or donation drives, ect.

Its largely because its easier to harass accessible people over it than it is to harass someone like Kim Kardashian, but its also because again: we have such a skewed understanding of what is actually effective in terms of activism and circulation of information.

Most of it comes down to shaming people and trying to assert that they're a bad person for having the privilege and benefits of a large following but not doing anything for other people or to 'deserve' that following. They're 'a bad person' for having 75,000 people's attention and not using it to force them to be aware of X.

A good example of proper audience targeting and activism is the page We Rate Dogs.

We Rate Dogs will share awareness posts and donation drives.

About dogs.

Because their followers are there for the dogs. Their followers like dogs. They want to enjoy dog content and help dogs.

If they started sharing posts about war and death and rape, the people who are following them to see cute dog videos will simply unfollow them.

They're using their targeted platform properly.

Hello, I'm the anon from before who mentioned making a special profic writing server for aspiring dead dove or profic (anti-harassment) authors. This is what the server looks like. It's invite-only (people will have to send me a message before joining). I hope this looks okay!

Looking snazzy!

Neat, orderly, good, rules, invite only... I hope the server will be a resounding success for you and the people who find themselves there.

FOR ANYONE INTERESTED:

The above is a dark romance literature server which is pro-proship and proship aligned. Please refer to the rules and defer to the sender of this ask for information on how to receive an invitation.

talking about antis being weird about family interactions reminds me of an older discourse case where antis accused someone of pedophilia for…

holding an infant correctly

the person held the infant between their legs, you’re SUPPOSED to do that to prevent the development of congenital hip dislocation (aka hip dysplasia)

the baby was also fully clothed

enough with this shit

It reminds me of posts I've seen on sites like Twitter and Reddit where people say things like:

"If you're an adult alone at Disneyland I'm automatically going to assume you're a pedophile."

Some people are just so insufferably radically stupid its almost beyond the point of belief. People wind up like that because of the mass hysteria that people build up surrounding moral grandstanding and being so desperate to not be A Bad Person and Fit In.

I've also seen claims that fathers shouldn't be changing their daughters and so forth. Its just complete brainrot, honestly.