Think About This 1 Point Before You Make Claims About What Is And Is Not Acceptable To Attack People

Think about this 1 point before you make claims about what is and is not acceptable to attack people for:

It doesn't matter if its incest, pedophilia or zoophilia.

Its fictional.

If you don't like it, you are welcome to take your own advice and move the fuck on with your day. It isn't aimed at you, it isn't for you, and if you don't like it, nobody is forcing you to engage with it.

I really do appreciate your sentiment, but fiction is not equitable to real life.

To all people who judge people based off of their ships, think about these 3 points before you do it: Is it incest? Is it pedophilia? Is it zoophilia? No? Then move the fuck on with your day and stop attacking people for something that isn't wrong.

As a Destiel shipper I actually think we should leave Jensen and Misha alone about Destiel. Its been almost a decade of asking the same questions and hounding them for fanservice and gratification.

Do you even understand that if there were no 'bad guys' and 'bad choices' and 'icky things' in media literally 99.99% of the music, movies, TV shows, books, ect that we have right now would not exist?

All those awesome action movies where its a race against time to save the world from a criminal organisation hellbent on chaos and world domination?

Gone.

The Great Gatsby and his slutty parties and reckless pining?

Gone.

Godzilla?

Gone.

Snoop Dogg and his beloved music?

Gone.

A world wherein we can freely see a young Hugh Dancy sluttily covered in blood and entrenched in a homoerotic, literally consuming love with a DILF-y Mads Mikkelson, also sluttily covered in blood?

Gone.

What would we even be left with? The gripping adventures of a man running from store to store to find the right kind of flour?

"Whhhaaaaahh, I hated this Evil Villain, I wish he wasn't in the movie!"

Good. That means the storytelling did its job. That means the actor played the Evil Villain well. That means the role was properly fulfilled.

That does not mean the Evil Villain shouldn't exist.

"If you like monsterfucking or eat meat you can't reblog my aesthetic slime post" is honestly the funniest concept to come out of the new age of social entitlement tbh.

I'm going to be fully honest, I hate the use of problematic as a coined term for fictional ships. I feel like problematic has just become one of those terms tossed around at anything and everything and often used as a gotcha net.

"I don't care about your ships as long as they're not problematic."

Okay. Are we talking about incest or just a ship where they have clashing political opinions?

Am I not allowed to ship the sentient wolf creature with the twink or am I not allowed to ship the two middle aged store clerks who have different views on wanting children?

What if one half of my canon ship gets de-aged to eighteen? Is it suddenly problematic to ship them for as long as that character remains de-aged?

What kind of age brackets are we defining as problematic these days? What are the cut-off points for when its not problematic for two people to fall in love? What if one person has a birthday before the other one and for a few months they're not part of that acceptable bracket anymore?

Problematic is just being used as a one-word way to shut people down and force them to comply with your own expectations and boundaries. Problematic is thrown around as a way to box people into behaving and existing in ways that make you comfortable.

"I don't like the way that you exist so I'm going to brand you as this negative word that forces you to change to suit my preferences or be shunned by society."

Problematic means to constitute as or to present a problem. It is not the shiny new term for 'if you ship this thing you're a terrible person.'

I wish I had a place to post my fucked up arts without being cancelled 😭

Honestly I think the drawn arts have suffered perhaps the most out of modern censorship. Especially the communities, too, because when sites ban things to please advertisers, investors and the handful of people squawking about protecting the children, it creates this mentality of; 'if its been banned its bad, so whoever makes it or enjoys it is bad too.'

There will literally always be at least one person who comes after you for what you create. Lord knows I enough enough angry anons in my inbox on a daily basis and all I do is rant about antis and occasionally knock my braincells together with enough force to say something vaguely helpful.

My best advice for avoiding being 'cancelled' is to heavily, heavily curate your online space and the people you aim to include within it. This could be by:

Following specifically other blogs who post similar content or express interest in similar content to what you produce or your interests.

Pre-emptively blocking blogs who express disgust or hatred for the content you produce or like, blogs who express moral stances conflicting to yours, ect. This is expressly helpful on sites like Twitter where options to limit engagement are limited.

Tagging properly, and including trigger and warnings tags whom others are likely to have blocked. This prevents people from seeing something they don't want to, and also gives you coverage if they try to accuse you of 'spreading it around.'

In cases of art that may have more extreme content, try using spoiler flags or any filtration option that requires viewers to actively consent to viewing it. Relevant to above, nobody can cry wolf about 'being exposed' because they would've had to physically reveal the work to themselves.

DeviantArt unfortunately recently changed its policies to a frankly ridiculously constrictive degree, so while I previously would've recommended that as a place to host your artwork and find a safer community, I can no longer. Hopefully someone is successful in pushing for the site to reform to its previous rules soon.

ArtStation is an option. The site is not eligible to anyone under 18 and sexual, gore, fetish, and 'mature' content is allowed provided the usual stipulation that you aren't using it in order to cause, infer or threaten harm against someone. A lot of the site is geared toward marketing artwork, though, so you might be hard pressed to find more of a community aspect to it.

Rule 34.com is... Objectively one of the best places you can host your artwork if you create content that is based on sexual themes. The protective rights aren't the greatest, but anyone who uses Rule 34 has no leg to stand on regarding morality and censorship.

Reddit has a lot of subreddits for sharing art, and a bonus is you can find subreddits specifically geared toward artwork based on things like gore, violence, sexual content, ect. Filtering options and monitoring are basically non-existent, however. Also, Reddit sometimes spontaneously decides a specific post is against its TOS and yeets it.

There's also the option of building a Discord server based around sharing artwork of certain themes, which is objectively the format that allows you the most control over who views it, but it also means your art has a limited presence. (Can't be reblogged, ect.)

If you do check out any of the websites, always be thorough in reading the Terms of Service and the Community Guidelines.