What In The World - Tumblr Posts
Uh...

nobody says that.
nobody uses "ejaculated" as a fucking way to say that
look how fucking bad it looks if i use that in my writing, like heres an example lmao
“Wait.” Eirairr ejaculated, his voice dead serious.
bruh
You had your own phone at 14? I didn't get one until I went to college. Any field trip ect. before that I used one of the two "family" cell phones.
I remember 7th grade. One of our teachers found out 3 girls in the class are vaping. Teachers were so shocked, woah, that never meant to happen, blah blah 🙄 guess they don't know half of the school is vaping as well 🤦🏼 #newgeneration
The principal was so angry, she did something I don't think it's legal 🤷🏼
She took their phones and just asked for the password. She looked at all their messages, photos, apps, literally the entire phone memory. After that she called their parents because of inappropriate images she found
But 😶
She continued on us and the entire school. She just asks for a password and tells you to leave the room. We were so scared we deleted EVERYTHING from our phones 😂 at the end she only asked a few more students and we did it for nothing 🤦🏼
Anyway
Wanted to ask how would you react 🙃
If the principal walks to you and says "Gimme your phone. What's the password?" What are you doing?
Knowing she would look at everything? 😂 Your private conversations with family, friends, social media, phone gallery, everything? (Imagine ur 13-14 years old)
@wrecking-it-raphie @ezgurple @rufwooff @redlotuz @randomcerealbrand @racky000 @turtlevariabilis @turt1esstuff @untitled-tmnt-blog @indieyuugure @iredoodles @ilovebeinaturtle @onionninjasstuff @porplewisteria @phewgitoid @pezhead @allyheart707 @alichu707 @stormy-m00n @disasterpartyyy @dotbot2012 @donnie-rp-blog @heckitall @justatoxictaurus @justasmallflick @knuxthefangirl @lara-cairncross @luna1star10 @luckynesser @lionalovit @yanteetle @xxlea-nardoxx @chessman-protocol @ceruleanterrapin @charcoaldustonmyfingers @bigb22374 @bluefeather-tmnt @butthead7 @neonzeontmnt @nightwatcherraph @ninnosaurus @matryoshkalex @mybasementpanda
😘

OH MY GOD?? I DONT KNOW WHERE ALL YOU PEOPLE CAME FROM BUT TYSM
WHATT??????
encore | jjk | teaser

⇥ pairing: game-designer!jungkook x reader
⇥ genre: strangers to lovers, neighbors au, fluff, smut
⇥ rating: 18+
⇥ warnings: an absolutely fluffy little piece, he is an ambivert but so hot too, talk about music and it’s really wholesome!!, coffeeshop dates and movie nights, cursing, pov switch, flirting, (okay how do i avoid c*mmunity labels uhhhh), s*xual tension, s*xual content (like: or*l, big d*ck and dom kook, s*x toys, unprotected s*x, fumbling around, m*sturbation, he can be cocky if he wants to, more when the fic drops)
⇥ wc: around 10-12k; 979 for the teaser!!
⇥ author’s notes: my friend said he looks like your next door neighbor who’ll lend you stuff and all, and of course my sick brain came up with this wicked thing. teaser is unedited!! fic still in the works which i’m so excited to post as soon as it’s doneee!<3
⇥ summary: The new guy next door seems an awfully lot like your ideal type. You might be in serious trouble.
–
When you look up from your shoes, meeting his eyes, you realize for the first time that Jungkook is staring at you.
Your eyebrows shoot up in question, humming a curious little, “Hmm?”
Keep reading
guys hes gone. i seriously cannot do this
I wish someone would put my post under the water, maybe I want to be lost at sea forever
MOM HELP I ACCIDENTALLY RAN OVER COFFEE WHAT DO I DO?!?!?!
*is just in your car with the seat all the way up. Sobbing as Coffee lays in the road family guy style.*
HOW THE HELL DID YOU RUN OVER COFFEE!!??
WHY DO YOU HAVE MY CAR?!?
I NEVER GAVE YOU THE KEY?!?
WHAT-
*stressed mother noises*
TAKE EM TO THE HOSPITAL?? THAT SHOULD BE THE FIRST THING-
LAWD CHILD

everyone on r/aita is doing polyamory so wrong and i think they could learn something from tommyinnit. I'm not going to say hes doing it any better but he is being really funny about it
You all can ignore this. Just.. again, for myself so I don't lose it:
What
I NEVER put THAT together
FROSTED FLAKES you have in a MORNING???
like MORKING FROST???
I need a minute
So I’m listening to Once Upon a Witchlight (I’ve been watching the shorts for forever now, I just never got around to listening to the actual campaign until tonight), and I just realized that Frosty is meant to be a fucking reference to fucking FROSTED FLAKES. His name is FROSTY and he’s a fucking TIGER. HOW DID I NOT PUT TWO AND TWO TOGETHER
I’ve been watching these shorts for a while, and yet it didn’t take me until the literal end of episode fucking 2 for me to make the connection.

This is an ACTUAL LINE in the game. I'm not kidding
@kaiholic
![[180321] Hyundai X Sm Endorsement Image](https://64.media.tumblr.com/ecd358106a4143600eaea7ffca2050b1/tumblr_p5wywqlMzU1vnak7xo1_500.jpg)
[180321] hyundai x sm endorsement image
I won the court case by the way 😎


Today an evil clown tellytubbly sued me :(
conflict, conceal, confess | minho

kinktober day 31: thigh-riding

pairing: lee minho x reader
word count: 18.1k (💀)
genre: college au, enemies to lovers, (modern!consort au)
warnings: sexual content (thigh-riding, oral sex, fingering, handjob, marking, a whole lot of smut honestly, like 6k words of it), swearing, an ungodly amount of academia

summary:
“Why don’t we call a truce?”
Minho blinked, caught off-guard. “Truce?”
“Yeah. No more arguments…” you trailed off, the words already sounding hollow and you were the one saying them. “OK, maybe some academic debate. But nothing personal.”
“Nothing petty,” Minho added, giving you a pointed look.
It took an impressive amount of willpower to force your smile to stay on your face. “Exactly. We somehow managed it as kids. How hard could it be to do it again?”

Keep reading
songs inspire me to create things*



Ridley Scott, regarding his new Napoleon movie, is being aggressively defensive about its inaccuracies with historians. He's gone on record saying "When I have issues with historians, I ask: ‘Excuse me, mate, were you there? No? Well, shut the fuck up then.’" This is a classic argument of people with no idea how historians do their work, how historical accuracy is determined and evaluated, and - in Ridley Scott's case in particular - how important it is to properly portray historical accuracy in other media.
The reason why Ridley Scott is being so aggressively dismissive of complaints about historical accuracy is due to past beef leading to a problem he likely has.
This is a movie that, by din of being touted as a 'nonfiction' movie about a historical figure, is basing much of its marketing on historical accuracy by default. The trailers show it's not, and reviews by historians say it is riddled with dozens if not hundreds of inaccuracies. Napoleon's portrayal is frankly a surface level depiction and nowhere near the nuance that historians were hoping for.
Scott's defensive about it. He need not be. If he had a historical consultant then he could go "I'm not an expert on the time period, but I have someone who is, ask them about it" and fob them off on his movie's historical consultant. It's a whole Thing. He doesn't have one, however, so he has to defend it personally.
You see, Ridley Scott probably didn't hire a historical consultant for Napoleon. The last time he had one - Kathleen Coleman for Gladiator - she was so upset over the inaccuracies he pushed through and how little her work affected the film, she requested her name be taken off of it.
Why this is important is because so many more people will watch a movie made by Ridley Scott than I or any other person could write. More people will watch Scott's Napoleon in the States than five hundred books about Napoleon combined worldwide.
More people watched Dunkirk than ever read a book about the Evacuation of Dunkirk. The movie Breaker Morant did so much for public perception about the execution of a genuine war criminal people in Australia still on occasion call for a pardon for Morant.
Fundamentally, mass media like movies will always have more impact of a popular perception about somebody, a time period, an event. That's why Ridley Scott making an inaccurate movie and going 'oh, you weren't there, you didn't see it with your own eyes, so how could you know, I don't have to listen to you' is a problem.