Hey Out There With All The Nice Seductive Fetish And Sex Offers We Love Your Perseverance To Send A Short

Hey out there with all the nice seductive fetish and sex offers we love your perseverance to send a short message to a blog over and over again.

However, Hi is really little effort to get attention and if your blog only has a photo or better no content then between us someone who wants to get attention for what is quite right in a capitalist world to earn money with it, should make a little more effort.

The best thing for us is always and we mean it seriously: hi I'm new here or that we are attractive which really only a fortune teller could know.

Selling sex or generating a clientele of nice fetishes who will give you money for whatever you offer them means creating an illusion that you are somehow available to the customer.

The old illusion of the customer who marries the hooker because she loves him and only him has to work.

So please make a little more effort and increase the quality to create an emotional dependency that is only one-sided but will always be two-sided in the customer's mind.

mod

Finally, foot fetishism is all well and good, but it should be beautiful feet.

Well, we was joking, your feet weren't that bad either - after all, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. There is a lover for almost every weird thing. We need to know because we love people who are weird and understand that everything is based on consensus, even the weirdest things.

What an awesome idea to dig a moat over 2000 miles and then fill it with snakes and alligators.

Well, we're not entirely serious here, but it would be endless jobs for Mexican immigrants.

Nonsense, once again Trump proves that he has no idea about business and is more likely to display medieval values.

How about a replacement for the Panama Canal, just at the longest point, which can never really be economical.

He had also recommended investigating pale science to see if it could help against Covid.

The sick thing is that his own party is going along with this nonsense just to get into power.

His supporters have no interest in differentiating and are completely overwhelmed by complex interrelationships.

Perhaps Trump was simply misinterpreted! It's an incredible opportunity to embark on the largest conservation project for renaturalization ever to be realized on American soil. While some may see nature conservation and Trump as two unlikely partners, we believe they can coexist.

Nonsense, we were only joking

mod

To be stupid, selfish, and have good health are three requirements for happiness, though if stupidity is lacking, all is lost.

Gustave Flaubert

However, unfortunately we are not all in this state of happiness, so we have a question and a new perspective. But if you ignore that, it's also easier.

It seems reasonable to posit that the assassination of the presidential candidate will have no influence on the current gun legislation.

Let us consider an alternative perspective. We may now be of the opinion that it would be beneficial for all members of society to procure firearms and ammunition in substantial quantities.

One might inquire as to why, if Project 2025 is to be implemented, it should not be accompanied by a robust resistance to deportations.

It is evident that criminal gangs are already armed. This observation does not pertain to the militias on the political right, but rather to Latin American and medieval gangs with American passports.

It would undoubtedly be entertaining to rid the country of a significant portion of its citizenry, deemed undesirable, if they were to be armed to the teeth.

Moreover, Trump himself has previously asserted that blood will flow if he is not elected. We assume that even if he is elected, he will not object to the shedding of blood.

Therefore, we call upon all liberals and Democrats, and we do not refer to members of the Democratic Party, but rather to those who stand behind the cause of democracy, to arm themselves.

Learning from history means that when the bad guys threaten violence and overthrow, the good guys have to be armed pacifists.

mod

There is, of course, a more prosaic approach: one must simply vote and choose reason over hatred. This will prevent the country from descending into a dictatorship.

mod

Thanks for the photo, so what do we see here?

@x-heesy 🙃

The picture composition consists of some room, two young women, two tables plus three chairs whereby only one is somehow almost completely visible. A plastic bag that is reusable, a charger on the table of one of the young women and probably a mobile phone next to the charger. And a fork, we hope. We'll leave the rest out of the equation.

We can see that, but what does the picture tell us?

If we assume that the young woman still lives at home, the picture would be a testimony to the unsustainability of the young woman's mother*. Giving her child spaghetti in a reusable plastic bag is the ultimate in disposable society. We assume that the plastic bags are thrown in the unsorted garbage, as little attention is paid to sorting garbage at school or university.

What do we see, however, is a mother who is practical and whose daughter has accepted that food culture is not a part of education.

Is the young woman loved? Yes, at least someone has made food for her.

What else do we see? The young woman has the plastic bags almost under her chin, which conversely means she doesn't want to spill. Which suggests a basic cleanliness and attentiveness to her clothes.

We leave the summary to you.... Thank you

Of course, there was another photographer, most likely using a cell phone with this quality, and the photo is older.

We don't want to read any more from this picture, because seeing pictures doesn't mean understanding pictures. But this is a matter of attitude and people often confuse or misinterpret images. We have seen pictures that are beautiful but say something else. The sea right in front of the terrace is beautiful, but it doesn't mean anything good in the context of rising sea levels.

*(we are assuming statistical data which means that more mothers still prepare their children's food for school than men)

@brute000

Y⃘u⃘m⃘ ⃘Y⃘u⃘m⃘ ⃘

The humanities teach us the value, even for business, of criticism and dissent. When there's a culture of going along to get along, where whistleblowers are discouraged, bad things happen and businesses implode.

Martha C. Nussbaum

Chelsea Manning, who's now set to be free May 17th [2017], after Obama shortened her sentence from 35 years to seven. According to her attorneys, she is already the longest-held whistleblower in U.S. history.

Amy Goodman

States and organizations that want to deny, hunt down, criminalize and lock away any corrective action have ultimately thrown their moral compass overboard in order to hide their ethical and moral depravity. This only goes to show that the so-called responsible parties really don't want to take responsibility.

A state or organization that creates special rights denies the principle of equality of a humanistic legal system and can therefore be considered criminal.

mod

Those who adhere to ethical and moral principles serve as beacons that bring the shadows of the world to light for us.

mod

NEW YORK (AP) — Peter Buxtun, the whistleblower who revealed that the U.S. government allowed hundreds of Black men in rural Alabama to go untreated for syphilis in what became known as the Tuskegee study, has died. He was 86.

Buxtun died May 18 of Alzheimer’s disease in Rocklin, California, according to his attorney, Minna Fernan.

Buxtun is revered as a hero to public health scholars and ethicists for his role in bringing to light the most notorious medical research scandal in U.S. history. Documents that Buxtun provided to The Associated Press, and its subsequent investigation and reporting, led to a public outcry that ended the study in 1972.

Forty years earlier, in 1932, federal scientists began studying 400 Black men in Tuskegee, Alabama, who were infected with syphilis. When antibiotics became available in the 1940s that could treat the disease, federal health officials ordered that the drugs be withheld. The study became an observation of how the disease ravaged the body over time.

In the mid-1960s, Buxtun was a federal public health employee working in San Francisco when he overheard a co-worker talking about the study. The research wasn’t exactly a secret — about a dozen medical journal articles about it had been published in the previous 20 years. But hardly anyone had raised any concerns about how the experiment was being conducted.

“This study was completely accepted by the American medical community,” said Ted Pestorius of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, speaking at a 2022 program marking the 50th anniversary of the end of the study.

Buxtun had a different reaction. After learning more about the study, he raised ethical concerns in a 1966 letter to officials at the CDC. In 1967, he was summoned to a meeting in Atlanta, where he was chewed out by agency officials for what they deemed to be impertinence. Repeatedly, agency leaders rejected his complaints and his call for the men in Tuskegee to be treated.

He left the U.S. Public Health Service and attended law school, but the study ate at him. In 1972, he provided documents about the research to Edith Lederer, an AP reporter he had met in San Francisco. Lederer passed the documents to AP investigative reporter Jean Heller, telling her colleague, “I think there might be something here.”

Heller’s story was published on July 25, 1972, leading to Congressional hearings, a class-action lawsuit that resulted in a $10 million settlement and the study’s termination about four months later. In 1997, President Bill Clinton formally apologized for the study, calling it “shameful.”

The leader of a group dedicated to the memory of the study participants said Monday they are grateful to Buxtun for exposing the experiment.

“We are thankful for his honesty and his courage,” said Lille Tyson Head, whose father was in the study.

(continue reading)

25000 Likes!

What else...!

Everyone wants to be liked; everyone wants approval. No one likes being ignored.

Daniel Mallory Ortberg