Do You Ever Remember They Established In Canon That Eggsy Unwin Is Into Anal Because I Just Did

Do you ever remember they established in canon that Eggsy Unwin is into anal because I just did

I think perhaps one of the worst things about trying to have genuine discussions or genuine conversations with people who are 'antis' is that, in the vast majority of cases, they will immediately jump to the worst possible faith take on absolutely anything you say and will refuse to consider anything else.

For example:

"Thought 'crimes' are not real crimes."

Now, the literal point of this statement is that, legally, you cannot be prosecuted for your thoughts. You can be prosecuted for acting on them, or for plotting to act on them (plotting is an action in itself), but you cannot be prosecuted for actual thoughts themselves.

E.g; I can think about slapping a police officer. If I actually did that would be assaulting an officer and I would, at minimum, get a fine and possibly a few days in a jail cell. But what do I get for just thinking about it?

Well, nothing. Even if I admit that I thought about it, they still can't prosecute me because I didn't actually do anything.

But if I say that statement to anti, immediately they'll launch into accusing me of condoning or endorsing pedophilia, even if the discussion we were having beforehand wasn't related to pedophilia at all. And once the word 'pedophilia' enters the discussion you might as well give up because that's their kryptonite spear and they'll never let go of it.

Which, as someone who genuinely wants to broker a more mutual understanding of each 'side' and a more harmonious co-existence, is incredibly frustrating and disappointing.

Hi! I saw your last post and I wanted to say something, but maybe I didn't get fully what you said:

What if someone uses that common tag just to make a critique about a certain media, especially or even if they are a fan of that media, are they wrong to use the main tag to post a critique or even a pet peeve? Or did you just meant by those people that harass others for not agreeing about their hate or something similar?

Critiquing media is different to just shitting on it because you don't like it.

For example, pointing out plot holes or poor writing is different to calling a piece of media childish or unimportant or belittling the people who do enjoy it regardless of said plot holes or poor writing.

I'm a fan of a lot of fandoms but I still have my contentions, disagreements and disappointments with the canon media, and part of fandom spaces is discussing those, but what I'm talking about is when people blatantly put personal negativity in areas where the main directive is positivity and enjoyment.

I feel like antis only ACTUALLY care about victims if they fit their "perfect narrative" of what a hurt person "should be" and I'm quite frankly tired of it

CoughStrangerThingsfandomcough.

By the way if you follow accounts on Instagram and Tumblr dedicated to sharing a huge quantity of fanart, especially about one thing in particular and with a huge range of art styles, 99% of it is stolen.

They call themselves "fan accounts" and "sharing accounts" but that's just shorthand for; "I steal other people's hard work and art so I can repost it and farm clout."

You'll usually see, at the very bottom of the caption, something like: Credit to creator. DM for credit. By ____

I implore you, no matter how good the art is, please don't feed into them. If you actually look into the people they're stealing from you'll usually find the original artist both doesn't allow reposts and isn't even aware that their art has been stolen.

They do not care about artists. Only how their art can benefit them.

I'm not gonna deny that a lot of remakes of films and shows can be pretty shit in comparison to the original but it always makes me laugh when I see people scoff and scream in outrage that 'some things should be alone' and 'remakes shouldn't be allowed' because like.

Gurl wtf you think fanfiction is.