I Want You To Know That If You Advocate For Genderless Fashion And Aesthetic And Believe Men Can Wear

I want you to know that if you advocate for genderless fashion and aesthetic and believe men can wear skirts, makeup, be feminine, ect and it doesn't 'mean anything' but then automatically assume and/or insist a man is queer in some way just because he does so, I am mentally beating you to death with a stick.

People who act like proshippers can't or don't have any icks are so funny to me because its like no, we do, we're just normal about it.

Hi! I saw your last post and I wanted to say something, but maybe I didn't get fully what you said:

What if someone uses that common tag just to make a critique about a certain media, especially or even if they are a fan of that media, are they wrong to use the main tag to post a critique or even a pet peeve? Or did you just meant by those people that harass others for not agreeing about their hate or something similar?

Critiquing media is different to just shitting on it because you don't like it.

For example, pointing out plot holes or poor writing is different to calling a piece of media childish or unimportant or belittling the people who do enjoy it regardless of said plot holes or poor writing.

I'm a fan of a lot of fandoms but I still have my contentions, disagreements and disappointments with the canon media, and part of fandom spaces is discussing those, but what I'm talking about is when people blatantly put personal negativity in areas where the main directive is positivity and enjoyment.

(The same anon from the CSEM thing, sorry)

When you said that even hyper-realistic art of a child could be considered CSEM, even if it was tecnically fake, a question popped out of my mind for some reason:

What if a artist decided to draw a fictional child character in a sexualized manner with a realistic artstyle, will this count as CSEM, even if the child doesn't exist?

(Sorry if I keep doing this type of questions)

As before this does technically hinge on the laws of where the content exists and where the creator who made it resides. The laws regarding visual images are often far more restrictive than those regarding literature.

For example, under the 2009 Coroners and Justice Act (s62-s68) within the United Kingdom it would be illegal if the artwork depicted sexual acts with a child or was explicitly focused on their genitals whether or not the child was real or fictional.

In the United States, the 2003 PROTECT Act defines that hyper-realistic sexual images (drawn, manipulated, ect) can only be prosecuted if they are indistinguishable from an image of a real child or cannot be proven as artificially created.

In Japan, however, pornography of fictional minors, even hyper-realistic, is a lucrative, legal and normalised industry. Its seen in everything from street art to manga.

E.g; works can be marked by the style of perspective written in and also searched by or filtered by the perspective written in.

I ask because I am someone who absolutely never reads first person literature, and often I come across fanfiction where the summary is in third person but once you click on the fanfiction the entire story is in first person POV. Its only a mild annoyance, but as far as features go its one that I, myself, would find very beneficial.

@mogai-knifefight-main in a stroke of hilarious fate (or you regretting your little reply spree and doing the dirty delete of shame) none of your comments are showing up on my actual posts, only little snippets in the activity log.

But I'll just do you a favor and reply to them all in one go:

If you click on my name, you'll see a super nifty little button that says BLOCK.

Click it and be happier and more at peace ❤