(The Same Anon From The CSEM Thing, Sorry)

(The same anon from the CSEM thing, sorry)

When you said that even hyper-realistic art of a child could be considered CSEM, even if it was tecnically fake, a question popped out of my mind for some reason:

What if a artist decided to draw a fictional child character in a sexualized manner with a realistic artstyle, will this count as CSEM, even if the child doesn't exist?

(Sorry if I keep doing this type of questions)

As before this does technically hinge on the laws of where the content exists and where the creator who made it resides. The laws regarding visual images are often far more restrictive than those regarding literature.

For example, under the 2009 Coroners and Justice Act (s62-s68) within the United Kingdom it would be illegal if the artwork depicted sexual acts with a child or was explicitly focused on their genitals whether or not the child was real or fictional.

In the United States, the 2003 PROTECT Act defines that hyper-realistic sexual images (drawn, manipulated, ect) can only be prosecuted if they are indistinguishable from an image of a real child or cannot be proven as artificially created.

In Japan, however, pornography of fictional minors, even hyper-realistic, is a lucrative, legal and normalised industry. Its seen in everything from street art to manga.

E.g; works can be marked by the style of perspective written in and also searched by or filtered by the perspective written in.

I ask because I am someone who absolutely never reads first person literature, and often I come across fanfiction where the summary is in third person but once you click on the fanfiction the entire story is in first person POV. Its only a mild annoyance, but as far as features go its one that I, myself, would find very beneficial.

Sexual rpf of minors is csem in the same manner that drawn nsfw of real minors is csem; The writer is sexually exploiting this minor and their likeness. Regardless of the legality of it (because legality is subjective), it is in fact exploitative and unethical to make nsfw of a real child in any manner. Children are incapable of consenting to having fiction of themselves in sexual situations written, you are only able to do so non-consensually.

"Regardless of the legality of it—"

Nope.

Then I can't show it without my blog getting flagged as NSFW probably but in the scene where Eggsy goes back for her they show that Merlin can see everything on the screen, and it shows her rolling over onto her stomach with a zoom-in of her butt and Eggsy reaching for it.

So, yep.

Do you ever remember they established in canon that Eggsy Unwin is into anal because I just did

First and second are the most popular when it comes to reader insert fanfiction, and first and third, although third dominates, are the most popular when it comes to character fanfiction.

I've found that first person is a lot more common in RPF fanfiction, but I still get the odd few crop up when I'm scouring character fanfiction. Most notably in DC or Marvel.

E.g; works can be marked by the style of perspective written in and also searched by or filtered by the perspective written in.

I ask because I am someone who absolutely never reads first person literature, and often I come across fanfiction where the summary is in third person but once you click on the fanfiction the entire story is in first person POV. Its only a mild annoyance, but as far as features go its one that I, myself, would find very beneficial.

I want you to know that if you advocate for genderless fashion and aesthetic and believe men can wear skirts, makeup, be feminine, ect and it doesn't 'mean anything' but then automatically assume and/or insist a man is queer in some way just because he does so, I am mentally beating you to death with a stick.