I'm Not Gonna Deny That A Lot Of Remakes Of Films And Shows Can Be Pretty Shit In Comparison To The Original

I'm not gonna deny that a lot of remakes of films and shows can be pretty shit in comparison to the original but it always makes me laugh when I see people scoff and scream in outrage that 'some things should be alone' and 'remakes shouldn't be allowed' because like.

Gurl wtf you think fanfiction is.

Anti: Comes onto my very obviously proship blog and makes a shitty comment about proshipping thinking I'll magically agree with them Me: Does Not Agree AntI: 😡😡 now I'm gonna go through all your posts and leave even more shitty comments and then block you and whine about it on my blog 😡😡

@mogai-knifefight-main in a stroke of hilarious fate (or you regretting your little reply spree and doing the dirty delete of shame) none of your comments are showing up on my actual posts, only little snippets in the activity log.

But I'll just do you a favor and reply to them all in one go:

If you click on my name, you'll see a super nifty little button that says BLOCK.

Click it and be happier and more at peace ❤

By the way, absolutely nobody is telling you that you can't dislike something or never ever talk about disliking something. What we are saying is to stop fucking battering ramming into spaces intended for the people who do and shouting your dislike at the same volume as a fucking jet engine.

It can be as simple as using an 'anti' tag instead of just the common tag.

Every goddamn day I see people deliberately pushing their hate and negativity into spaces literally constructed around people liking something and then lashing out and whining when people tell them to gtfo and its like, nope. They have a point. You don't walk into a smoothie store just to bitch about how much you hate smoothies.

There are places for positivity and places for negativity. If you stay in the one you belong to, nobody is going to silence you.

I wanted to ask about something: does the rpf of real minors considered CSEM? If not, does that mean tha CSEM is just refering to pictures of real minors?

That would come down to the legal parameters of where the work was created and/or hosted but in general, no, because no actual minor is being exploited. The 'material' isn't real and there's no visual to try and present it as such.

(In the way that hyper-realistic artwork or photo manipulations would. Technically the material itself is fake but it was created with the aim of presenting it as real, or assumed as real.)

That, and, it can be incredibly difficult to actually manage all the different criteria of what makes it a crime or not, and what qualities tip it over into the league of actionable.

In some countries its technically illegal, but rarely if ever actually prosecuted or acted against. In much the same way that technically, a lot of fan-made merchandise is illegal, but the companies and trademarks only ever enact a strike when the gets 'too big.'

The gist is, barring very few exceptions, and fewer still actual prosecutions, no. It is not.

Do you ever remember they established in canon that Eggsy Unwin is into anal because I just did