We Use Both Of The Terms

We use both of the terms

But being more theoretically, introjects in CDD context are alters who formed based on something that already existed, and because the oc already existed when the alter formed... Well yeah, it's an introject

This can also applied to any other creation the system mades and then gets in the system as an alter, they're introjections

If I'm not wrong autoject is a term for all the introjects whose source is something created by someone else of the system, some autojects don't consider completely like introjects because the brain made them but not from scratch, so you can just use that if you want

Labels are that, labels, made for your own comfort, so if they don't like introject/autoject/brainmade let them use whatever they want, but theoretically speaking they're introjects, or if they wanna be a little bit more introject separated but still explain they have an "external" source they can use autoject

another serious question for the osddid community

when you make an oc and then get an alter of said oc is that technically an introject? like one of ours just considers herself brainmade since she barely associates with her source anyway (literally an oc we had at like 12) but then another considers themself an introject so it’s??

like are they technically brainmade since yeah it’s an existing character but it’s YOUR OWN existing character or like? 😭

ik labels don’t matter that much but i’ve been curious for a while now

I just realize the reason why I didn't like to investigate or talk about CDD but I used to have that as an hyperfix is because of splitting

I split an alter who was so so fixated on the topic that every friend we have and even in the own system we called them "The CDD master", now he splitted and it's not here anymore, and I fused with some of their fragments and I'm again fixed on this topics

This alter kept my hyperfix when it split... HE TOOK PART OF MY IDENTITY TO FORM HIS 😭

Bro's sucking my hyperfix/special interest

This is just another prove that alters don't make more identities, is just dividing and having less identity distributed in several parts

Me when I remember something I said ages ago that was wrong or my values no longer align with

reblog if you're a therian and you run an active blog. trying to find some fellow therians 👍

It happened us very similar and more confusing tbh

DID -> I can't be a system that's ridiculous -> P-DID -> OSDD -> What am I saying this isn't posible -> DID -> pfDID

yall heard of osdd to pfdid pipeline but have you heard of

did -> im not a system -> osdd -> pdid -> polyfragmented pdid (i was unaware that pdid didnt actually fit my symptoms and it isnt possible to be pdid and polyfrag to my knowledge) -> pfdid

I see a pattern with the anon claims in our sideblogs, and my brain associates them with each other although maybe those anons aren't related at all

Idk, I just wanted to share that because I find it funny