Debate - Tumblr Posts - Page 2
Why do you worship your god YHWH as the only one? This is a legitimate question? What good does it do for you? Everything your god has done for you shouldn't have anything to do with his status, or uniqueness. I've seen the power of gods alien to your own, from Hel (the goddess I'm closest to, though I do worship others), I've seen her stop animals from moving, protect the sick and wounded, and cause a blind preacher to see her and flee. And I've felt her love, felt her comfort (I probably wouldn't even identify as agender if it wasn't for her help). But because she is not your god you would call this demonic? And say my soul is bound for damnation? Why not admit the existence of other gods, and keep to your own if you wish. How can your relationship with your god even be safe if you can't leave for another? How can it be called anything but bigotry to deny another god's divinity while you worship one yourself?
hey !! i'll try and answer all your questions.
"Why do I worship God as the only God?" - Because according to the Bible, He is the only God. It's mentioned several times in the Bible (1 Kings 8:60, 2 Samuel 7:22, 1 Corinthians 8:4-6, to name a few). It would be heresy for me to believe in the Christian God and then try and affirm the existence of other gods. My relationship with God, as my protector, does me a lot of good and is very safe (Isaiah 41:10, 1 Timothy 2:7), and I believe only in Him because I do not need anyone else (Phillipians 4:19). He is abundance. Also, even if there were multiple gods, I'd still choose Him, because of the good He's done in my live and the lives of others. Finally, whilst there are a lot of bigots in Christianity, we are specifically called to be the opposite of that (Luke 14:7-11). I accept you have God-given free will to worship who you please, but in order to be truly saved, worshipping Him is the only answer.
"What about the existence of other gods/goddesses? I've seen XYZ." The actions you talk about Hel doing are all things God has done. Protecting animals (Psalm 50:10-11), healing the sick (James 5:14-15) and people running away from God (Genesis 19:26). Regarding the last one, how do you know that the blind preacher saw Hel specifically? Do you have any evidence to confirm that?
"What about the existence of other gods/goddesses? I've felt XYZ." God has also been shown to be a source of love (1 John 4:16) and comfort (Psalm 23:4). It's awesome that you've discovered your gender identity ! Are you sure Hel was the reason for that...
"Is this demonic? Is my soul bound for damnation?" You are not demonic. You are just, as respectfully as I can put it, worshipping a false god. That doesn't define you as a person. As for whether you are bound for damnation, literally no one believes in predestination apart from Calvinists. One of the main ideas in Christianity is that God has unlimited mercy and grace, and He will welcome you with open arms the second you repent and let Him in. No matter how far you've strayed, you can always come back ^-^.
Okay, I think that was all your questions. Hopefully you have answers, but if you're still unsure, just ask me again !! Also, I have questions for you.
-I'm assuming you're a pagan (last I checked, Hel was a pagan goddess, though idk a lot about paganism tbh). Do you have some kind of book/scripture/anything that affirms your belief in pagan god(desse)s? The pagan version of the Bible, essentially.
-In a similar vein, how did you get started with paganism?
-Were you ever involved in Christianity?
-You talk a lot about pluralism (the belief that multiple gods from different religions can coexist) but you seem reticent to admit the existence of the Christian God. Why? What about Him specifically makes you not want to believe in Him?
Sorry if I'm being rude, I'm really just trying to understand as much as I can ! Have a good day !! Jesus loves you ❤️ 🙏
Is cheesecake a pizza? Y/N
Crust on the bottom, cheese on top.
I need help to settle a debate XD
Scientific proof there’s a D in refrigerator:
TAKE THAT (you know who you are)
Free Will vs Determinism
In the grand theater of philosophical discourse, the debate between free will and determinism has persisted through the ages, each side presenting compelling arguments in defense of its position. Yet, upon closer examination, it becomes evident that the notion of free will withstands scrutiny, even in the face of formidable counterarguments.
Detractors of free will often assert that our actions are governed by a complex interplay of genetic predispositions, environmental influences, and neurological processes—a deterministic framework that seemingly leaves no room for genuine autonomy. They point to studies in neuroscience that suggest our decisions are prefigured by neural activity milliseconds before we consciously perceive them, implying that our sense of agency is illusory.
However, this deterministic perspective fails to account for the multifaceted nature of human consciousness. While it is true that our biology and environment shape our perceptions and predispositions, it does not follow that they entirely determine our choices. Rather, they provide the context within which our capacity for free will operates—a canvas upon which we paint the strokes of our decisions.
Furthermore, the very act of deliberation, of weighing options and considering consequences, speaks to the reality of our agency. While our subconscious may influence our thoughts and behaviors, it is our conscious awareness that ultimately guides our actions. In this sense, free will emerges not as a force divorced from causality but as a dynamic interplay between our internal desires and external constraints.
Moreover, the existence of moral responsibility presupposes the existence of free will. If our actions were wholly determined by external factors, then notions of praise, blame, and accountability would lose their meaning. Yet, in our everyday interactions, we hold individuals accountable for their choices, recognizing the fundamental freedom inherent in moral agency.
In conclusion, while determinism presents a compelling framework for understanding the mechanics of causality, it falls short in capturing the full breadth of human experience. Free will, far from being an illusion, serves as the cornerstone of our moral and existential significance—a beacon of autonomy in the vast expanse of existence. Thus, in the eternal quest for truth and understanding, let us embrace the profound reality of our capacity to choose, to shape our destinies, and to navigate our own paths through the currents of time.
Navigating the Crossroads: Exploring the Dichotomy of Free Will vs. Fate
Shaina Tranquilino
May 25, 2024
In the realm of philosophical musings and existential ponderings, few debates are as timeless and tantalizing as the tug-of-war between free will and fate. It's a topic that has captured the imagination of poets, philosophers, and thinkers throughout the ages, each grappling with the age-old question: do we chart our own destiny, or are we mere pawns in the hands of fate?
In a poignant reflection on this eternal quandary, a poem aptly titled "Free Will vs. Fate" by s.m.t., serves as a poetic lens through which we can explore the complexities of human agency and the enigmatic forces that shape our lives.
The poem begins by evoking a sense of contemplation, inviting readers to ponder whether we truly steer the course of our lives or whether we are merely swept along by the currents of fate. This dichotomy sets the stage for a nuanced exploration of the interplay between choice and destiny.
"Choices made, yet fate entwined,
In destiny, our paths aligned."
Here, the poet suggests that while we may make choices along the journey of life, there is a sense of inevitability, a predestined intertwining of our fates. It raises the question: are our choices truly our own, or are they predetermined by some higher power or cosmic design?
"Free will whispers, soft and clear,
'Choose your path, dispel the fear,'"
Amidst the ambiguity, the voice of free will emerges, urging us to seize control of our destinies, to embrace autonomy and agency in the face of uncertainty. It is a rallying cry against the notion of fatalism, a reminder that we have the power to shape our own reality.
"Yet unseen hands may guide our way,
In subtle nudges, night and day."
However, even as we strive to exercise our free will, the poem suggests that unseen forces may still exert influence over our lives. Whether through coincidence, synchronicity, or the subtle workings of fate, there is a recognition that our paths may be gently nudged in certain directions, beyond our conscious control.
"Are we authors of our fate,
Or do we dance to rhythms great?
In life's vast play, we seek to find,
The balance of both heart and mind."
Ultimately, the poem beckons us to ponder the delicate balance between free will and fate, between autonomy and determinism. It reminds us that while we may not have all the answers, we are participants in the grand tapestry of existence, navigating the crossroads of choice and destiny with humility and grace.
In essence, "Free Will vs. Fate" serves as a poignant reminder of the eternal quest for meaning and purpose in a world where the lines between choice and fate often blur. It challenges us to confront our assumptions, to embrace the complexities of the human experience, and to find solace in the journey itself, wherever it may lead.
As we continue to ponder life's imponderables, may we draw inspiration from the timeless wisdom of poetry, and may we find solace in the search for truth amidst the mysteries of existence.
So, dear reader, as you contemplate the verses of this thought-provoking poem, I invite you to embark on your own journey of self-discovery, to wrestle with the age-old questions of free will and fate, and to embrace the profound beauty of the human experience in all its complexity.
I have heard few voices in the community against ai generated art, this is my personal perspective on the topic. But I also invite you to a dialogue - everyone who hates/loves/neutral to ai art in general and particularly on tumblr... Please explain your point of view, I want to understand you better😉
Carmen part 3 -
Benefits of ai for an artist in hardest days of disability - I can keep fulfilling my imagination even in days of very low ability to move. Of course when I paint I express something more authentic, but with time I compose prompts that give results that are very close to my imagination - which deeply satisfy and comfort me.
I’m watching it right now too and I’m losing it. He’s arguing with the interviewers and she’s laughing at him. This is glorious
watching the harris trump debate with my mother for family bonding. this guy is insane
follow forthefuns for more funny stuff
My friends where telling me I was wrong when I said cold shredded cheese doesn’t belong on a sandwich. I need help ending this debate because they yelled at me.
The only ‘sandwich’ I can tolerate with shredded is a grilled cheese because its melted.
Yknow the debate on how centaurs wear pants?
This is a really easy question actually, it just depends on the question how would a centaur wear a shirt, and that's easy, like a normal fucking human, and so he would wear the bottom right option, to keep himself covered
Q.e.d.
Getting salty at the Matalan evening menswear launch
I find the argument of “it’s unnatural” a stupid one. Nature is just the way living creatures interact with each other. We are living creatures. We are animals, and even if we live in these big complexes, we made those big complexes. Ants live in these big colonies that they build, and in a way our cities are just colonies on a much larger scale. Unlike ant colonies however, our systems also evolve. From steam to gasoline our machines evolve too. And do you know why that is? It’s because humans evolved the capabilities to transfer knowledge between generations, and have enough storage for knowledge to understand that despite just how much information there is to be understood. The collective knowledge we hold is unique to humanity, but every animal has unique traits. How is everything humans do not part of the natural order? When did humans start seeing themselves as separate from it?
Now when we talk about things like factories, gender equality, and sexuality, people often say “its just not natural.” And this argument doesn’t make sense to me. Everything is natural. The only thing unnatural would be me suddenly breaking the laws of physics and levitating off the ground. The idea of nature is a complex idea that we broadly ascribe to plants and animals and the earth. The thing with complex ideas is that you cannot just say that something isnt part of the complex idea. Complex ideas are abstract and often can be applied to anything if you decide to look hard enough and ask enough questions about it. So a definitive “it’s not natural” is both an incorrect and true statement. It all is really subjective and if you’re going to try to convince me of something using that as your argument, what’s stopping me from interpreting that in a direction that goes the opposite of what you were trying to say. Say I’m a trans person and you argue “it’s not natural”. What’s stopping me from saying “since when has humanity given a damn about what’s natural” or “but it is natural, I am human and therefore it is natural.” Or even just “ok.”
TL;DR
“It’s not natural” is a dumb argument for literally anything and people need to find better arguments to make when defending their point.
" Don't come to an argument thinking you already won it.
With this mentality you can only share reject and disdain. "
Unknown
I've been meaning to have this posted for a while. HEAR ME OUT.
So the whole debate about Tom Cruise being Superior Iron-Man or not is something that I think would be an okay idea.
Superior Iron-Man is an alternative version of Iron-Man, like RDJ's Iron-Man is an alternative version of the comic version of Iron-Man. So it would make sense to have a different actor to play an alternative version.
I know it's sad not to see RDJ as Iron-Man but that arc (unfortunately) is over (for the foreseeable future before Marvel/MCU does a full 180°). But having a different version of Tony Stark isn't replacing the one we all know and love.
I hope this makes a bit of sense... :') please don't attack me-
🇨🇵 Sondage : quels arguments démonter ? - 🇬🇧 Survey : What arguments should I dismantled ?
🇨🇵 À vous de répondre : quels arguments de Snaters vous viennent en tête ? Je prends de tout :)
🇬🇧 It’s up to you to answer : which Snaters' arguments come to your mind ? I take everything :)